Question

The grounding of the Boeing 737 MAX aircraft following two tragic crashes has led to criticism that the company should have been forced to address key safety component issues earlier. Which of the following would best explain the reluctance of overseers to strictly enforce existing safety regulations? a. issue networks urged against regulation b. the judiciary ruled the regulations were unconstitutional c. grassroots lobbying supported the creation of the aircraft d. policymaking was made through an iron triangle

Answer 1

The correct answer is d. policymaking was made through an iron triangle.

The reluctance of overseers to strictly enforce existing safety regulations in the case of the Boeing 737 MAX can be attributed to the concept of an "iron triangle." An iron triangle represents a cozy relationship between regulatory agencies, industry players (like Boeing), and lawmakers. In this context, policymakers often develop close ties with the aviation industry, leading to regulatory capture and a tendency to prioritize industry interests over strict safety enforcement.

This cozy relationship can hinder effective oversight and enforcement of safety regulations, as regulators may be influenced by industry lobbying and pressure. This dynamic can result in delays in addressing critical safety component issues and ultimately jeopardize public safety. Therefore, the correct answer is d. policymaking was made through an iron triangle.