Final answer:
The Supreme Court case United States v. Darby (1941) expanded the definition of "commerce" under the Commerce Clause, allowing greater congressional authority to regulate economic activities.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Supreme Court case United States v. Darby (1941) expanded the definition of "commerce" under the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution. In this case, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which regulated wages and working hours. The court ruled that the FLSA was a valid exercise of Congress's power to regulate commerce, as it impacted the production of goods that were intended for interstate commerce.
By expanding the definition of "commerce," the Supreme Court broadened the reach of congressional authority to regulate economic activities. The Court held that even activities that were purely local in nature, if they had a substantial effect on interstate commerce, could be subject to regulation.
For example, if a local business engaged in unfair labor practices, the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Darby allowed the federal government to intervene and regulate those practices under the Commerce Clause.
Learn more about expansion of commerce definition