Final answer:
The judiciary does not typically remove corrupt government officials. While they interpret laws, resolve disputes, cancel unconstitutional laws, and protect citizens' rights, the removal of corrupt officials generally lies with other branches or agencies for governmental integrity.
Step-by-step explanation:
The role that is not typically designated to the judiciary is the removal of corrupt officers from the government. While it's the judiciary's duty to interpret laws, resolve disputes, cancel unconstitutional laws, and protect citizens' fundamental rights, it does not generally have the authority to remove corrupt government officials. This function typically lies with the executive branch or agencies established to monitor governmental integrity. However, courts can cause the removal of such officials indirectly by convicting them of crimes they have committed.
For example, in the U.S, the judiciary—part of the judicial branch—interprets, defends, and applies laws. However, in an action typically separate from the judiciary's duties, a different process would handle the removal of erring government officials. An official proven to be involved in corrupt activities might be impeached, removed from their position, or convicted and penalized, but the courts would only involve themselves to the extent of their mandate, which is to interpret and enforce the law.
Learn more about Judiciary