Question

SS.USG 2324.C.3.11/3 of 5

Which statement explains how the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona further defined the safeguards of the Fith Amendment?
OA It extended the freedom from self-incrimination to include police interviews.
OB. It expanded the freedom from self-incrimination to include family members.
O C. It effected the freedom from detainment without indictment.
OD. It legalized the freedom from testifying without a subpoena.

Answer 1

The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona extended the freedom from self-incrimination to include police interviews and established the requirement of Miranda rights for individuals being interrogated by the police.

Step-by-step explanation:

The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona extended the freedom from self-incrimination to include police interviews. This ruling mandated that individuals must be informed of their rights (Miranda rights) before being interrogated by the police. It emphasized the right to remain silent and the right to have an attorney present during the police interviews.

Learn more about U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona