Final answer:
Shi Huangdi's practices were controversial and continue to be debated. Some argue they were necessary for power consolidation while others criticize his oppressive rule. Perspectives on the justification of his practices vary.
Step-by-step explanation:
Shi Huangdi's Practices: Justified or Not?
Shi Huangdi, also known as Qin Shi Huang, was the first emperor of China, ruling from 221 to 210 BCE. His practices were controversial and continue to be debated among historians. Some argue that his brutal methods and policies, such as the burning of books and burying of scholars, were necessary to centralize power and maintain order. Others criticize his authoritarian rule as oppressive.
One can argue that from a perspective of consolidating power and unifying the fractured state of ancient China, Shi Huangdi's practices were justified. The construction of the Great Wall, standardization of measurements, writing systems, and currency were significant accomplishments that had long-lasting effects. Additionally, his strong centralized government laid the foundation for future Chinese dynasties. However, his stringent policies and harsh treatment of dissenters cannot be ignored.
Ultimately, whether Shi Huangdi's practices were justified or not depends on one's perspective and the values they hold. It is essential to consider both the positive and negative aspects of his reign and evaluate them in the historical context in which they occurred.
Learn more about Shi Huangdi's Practices