Final answer:
The developer might consider appealing to the local authority for a variance, presenting arguments about the benefits of the manufacturing facility. Appealing to federal regulators for a variance is also a choice, but it may be a more complex process. Building the facility and paying the fine or including residential units in the project are not ideal solutions.
Step-by-step explanation:
If a zoning regulation prohibits a developer from constructing a manufacturing facility in a residentially zoned location, the developer might consider appealing to the local authority for a variance. A variance is a request to deviate from the standard zoning regulations. The developer can present arguments to the local authority about the benefits of the manufacturing facility and how it can be a valuable addition to the area.
By appealing for a variance, the developer can demonstrate how the manufacturing facility can create job opportunities, contribute to the economic growth of the region, or meet demands for certain products. The local authority may grant the variance if they find the developer's arguments convincing and believe that the benefits outweigh any potential negative impacts on the residential area.
While appealing to federal regulators for a variance is also a possible choice, it may be a more complex and time-consuming process compared to appealing at the local level. Building the facility and paying the fine would be a violation of the zoning regulation and could lead to legal consequences. Including residential units in the project could potentially be an option to make the proposal more appealing to the local authority, but it would depend on the specific zoning regulations and requirements.
Learn more about Zoning regulations and appealing for variances