Question

1. Find Evidence: According to the definition of public art in the text

"What is Public Art?", "what is needed [to be considered public
art] is a commitment to invention, boldness, cooperation - not
compromise." Highlight four details that support the claim that
what McCray created was public art.
2. Write: Why might a person argue that McCray's graffiti is not
public art?

Answer 1

McCray's graffiti can be considered public art due to its commitment to invention, boldness, cooperation, and lack of compromise. However, some may argue that it is not public art because it is often seen as vandalism and lacks formal approval and funding.

Step-by-step explanation:

According to the definition of public art in the text 'What is Public Art?', four details that support the claim that what McCray created was public art are:

1. Commitment to invention: McCray's graffiti displays creativity and originality, which are characteristics of public art.
2. Boldness: McCray's graffiti art is daring and eye-catching, capturing attention and making a strong statement.
3. Cooperation: McCray collaborates with local communities and organizations, involving them in the creation and placement of his artwork.
4. Not compromise: McCray's artwork maintains its integrity and vision, not being influenced or watered down by external pressures or compromises.

A person might argue that McCray's graffiti is not public art because it is often created without permission and can be seen as vandalism. Additionally, some may argue that graffiti lacks the formal approval and funding typically associated with public art projects.

Learn more about McCray's graffiti as public art