In order to analyze Sadie Frowne's attitude towards the injuries she and other workers endure at her factory, we would need specific textual information or context from a particular source, such as a book, article, or interview with Sadie Frowne. Without such information, I can provide a general framework for analyzing attitudes towards workplace injuries.
1. Empathy vs. Indifference:
- If Sadie Frowne expresses empathy and concern for the injuries suffered by herself and her fellow workers, it would indicate a caring and sympathetic attitude. This would not be surprising, as empathy towards others' suffering is a common human response.
2. Resignation vs. Activism:
- If she appears resigned to the injuries as an unfortunate but unavoidable part of working conditions, it suggests a more passive attitude. This might not be surprising if she believes little can be done to change the situation.
3. Anger vs. Acceptance:
- If Sadie Frowne expresses anger or frustration about the injuries and feels that they are unjust, it would show a more proactive attitude towards addressing the issue. This may or may not be surprising, depending on the context and her personal history.
4. Surprise or Expected Attitude:
- Whether her attitude surprises you or not would depend on the cultural, historical, and personal context. If workplace injuries are common and accepted in her industry or region, her attitude might not be surprising. Conversely, if she expresses a strong desire for change in a context where injuries are not typically addressed, it could be surprising.