Question

Question 11

Which argument would those who believe that the development of nuclear weapons is dangerous highlight to
support their position?
A
The devastation unleashed by atomic bombs in World War II is a convincing argument to the leaders of the
world not to risk another world war.
B) Nuclear arsenals are very dangerous because a terrible accident could happen at any time.
There is no way to disprove the argument that atomic weapons prevent future world wars.
Other types of weapons, such as biological weapons, are more useful in deterring another world war than the
threat of nuclear weapons.

Answer 1

Those who believe nuclear weapons are dangerous often highlight the devastation caused by atom bombs in WWII, the risk of accidents, and the argument that they prevent future world wars.

Step-by-step explanation:

Those who believe that the development of nuclear weapons is dangerous often highlight the devastation unleashed by atomic bombs in World War II as a convincing argument to not risk another world war. The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki caused immense destruction, loss of life, and suffering, serving as a stark reminder of the catastrophic consequences of nuclear weapons.

Another argument often cited is the danger of accidents. Nuclear arsenals are highly complex and there is a risk of accidental detonation or unauthorized use. A single technical error or misjudgment could have disastrous consequences, making the existence of nuclear weapons inherently dangerous.

The argument that nuclear weapons prevent future world wars is also put forth. This viewpoint suggests that the existence of nuclear weapons serves as a deterrent, as the potential devastation and loss of life they can cause act as a powerful incentive for nations to avoid conflict.

Learn more about Nuclear weapons safety