Final answer:
During the time of slavery, a large plantation owning Southern slaveholder would most likely agree with the statement that 'State Law should be more powerful than Federal law'. This was because they wanted to maintain their power over the institution of slavery and feared the federal government's imposition of restrictions on it.
Step-by-step explanation:
The person who would most likely agree with the statement that 'State Law should be more powerful than Federal law' is a Large plantation owning Southern slaveholder.
During the time of slavery in the United States, Southern states heavily relied on slave labor, and they wanted to maintain their power over the institution of slavery. They believed that state laws should have more authority to protect their economic and social interests, which included owning slaves. They feared that the federal government would impose restrictions on slavery, hence preferring more power for state laws.
This view was in direct contrast to Abraham Lincoln, who opposed slavery and fought to preserve the Union during the American Civil War.
An abolitionist from the Union would also disagree with the statement, as they advocated for the abolishment of slavery and the strengthening of federal laws to achieve that goal.
Learn more about Power balance between state and federal law