Question

Many state legislators have decided to take on crime and other forms of

delinquency in schools through zero tolerance policies. They believe that
identifying and removing disruptive or poorly performing students will
improve the overall quality of the school. What does this argument fail to
address?

Answer 1

The argument fails to address the potential underlying causes of disruptive behavior, the impact on the overall school environment, and the potential for disproportionate effects on certain student groups.

Step-by-step explanation:

The argument in favor of zero tolerance policies fails to address several important points. Firstly, it overlooks the fact that not all disruptive behavior is driven by delinquency. Sometimes, students may exhibit disruptive behavior due to personal or emotional issues that need to be addressed through counseling or intervention rather than punishment. Secondly, removing poorly performing students may not necessarily improve the overall quality of the school, as it may create a selective environment where only high-performing students are prioritized and others are excluded. Thirdly, zero tolerance policies may disproportionately affect certain groups like students of color or students with disabilities, leading to further inequalities.

Learn more about Zero tolerance policies in schools