Question

The landmark U.S. Supreme Court case, Strickland v. Washington (1984), defined what?

O Concept of attorney competence by establishing a two-prong test for the determining the effectiveness of counsel.
O Prosecutorial misconduct and the "prosecutorial vindictiveness" doctrine.
O Indigency and that defendants who can not employ their own attorney should be granted counsel in their defense.
O None of the answers provided are correct.

Answer 1

FINAL ANSWER:

Concept of attorney competence by establishing a two-prong test for the determining the effectiveness of counsel.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the case of Strickland v. Washington (1984), the U.S. Supreme Court provided a framework for evaluating the effectiveness of legal representation by defining the concept of attorney competence. The Court established a two-prong test to determine whether a defendant received constitutionally effective counsel as required by the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. This test consists of two parts:

1. Deficient Performance: The first prong examines whether the attorney's performance fell below the standard of what a reasonably competent attorney would provide. In other words, it assesses whether the legal representation was deficient or subpar.

2. Prejudice: The second prong evaluates whether the defendant was prejudiced by the deficient performance. This means determining if the defendant's case outcome would likely have been different had it not been for the attorney's errors.

If both prongs are satisfied, it may indicate that the defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel, which can potentially lead to the reversal of a conviction or other legal remedies. This case's decision has had a profound impact on how the effectiveness of legal representation is assessed in criminal cases, emphasizing the importance of competent legal counsel for defendants.