Question

*1F

In a landmark Supreme Court decision, Chief Justice John Marshall argued * 1p
that, although there was no specified clause in the Constitution granting
Congress the power to create a bank,
O The nation did not need a national bank anyway
O It was clearly unconstitutional for Congress to create a bank
Congress could create one because it was consistent with other powers listed in th
Constitution
He had ruled in favor of the bank anyway because he didn't like Thomas Jefferson
nstated powers that are logically delegated to Cong

Answer 1

The landmark Supreme Court decision discussed in this question is McCulloch v. Maryland, in which Chief Justice John Marshall argued that Congress could create a national bank based on implied powers in the Constitution.

Step-by-step explanation:

The subject of the question is History and the landmark Supreme Court decision discussed is related to the creation of a national bank.

In the case of McCulloch v. Maryland, Chief Justice John Marshall argued that although there was no specific clause in the Constitution granting Congress the power to create a bank, Congress could create one because it was consistent with other powers listed in the Constitution. Marshall believed that Congress had the authority to create a national bank based on the necessary and proper clause and the supremacy clause.

This decision established the principle of implied powers, which means that even if a power is not explicitly stated in the Constitution, if it is necessary to carry out other powers, Congress has the authority to do so. Marshall's ruling in favor of the bank was not influenced by personal liking or disliking, but rather by interpreting the Constitution and its implications for the federal government's powers.

Learn more about Supreme Court decision on the creation of a national bank