45.5k views
2 votes
Question 47

A child born today in the U.S. has an ecological footprint 10 times higher t
that of a child born in India and produces 8 times more carbon dioxide, so
ultimately population growth in developed nations like the U.S. will have a
larger negative impact on global ecosystems than will the same amount of
population growth in developing nations like India.
O True
O False

User AlicanC
by
7.4k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

Population growth in developed nations has a larger negative impact on global ecosystems than in developing nations.


Step-by-step explanation:

The subject of this question is social studies and it pertains to the topic of population growth and its impact on global ecosystems. The statement in question suggests that population growth in developed nations like the U.S. would have a larger negative impact on global ecosystems compared to the same amount of population growth in developing nations like India.

To analyze this statement, we can consider that the ecological footprint of a child born in the U.S. is 10 times higher than that of a child born in India, and they produce 8 times more carbon dioxide. This suggests that the resource consumption and carbon emissions in developed nations are significantly higher.

While population growth in any region can have a negative impact on ecosystems, the statement implies that the impact is greater in developed nations due to their higher consumption patterns and carbon emissions. Hence, the statement is true.


Learn more about population growth and its impact on global ecosystems

User Gabriel Llorico
by
8.3k points