Question

In 1976, a Nebraska state trial judge issued a gag order, restricting the

press from publishing or broadcasting information about the case. The
Nebraska Press Association appealed the ruling and the case went to the
Supreme Court. The Court ruled that the press reporting events
surrounding the trial would not affect the defendant's right to a fair trial.
Which of the following constitutional protections or clauses does this
case have in common with New York Times Co. v. United States (1971)?
Choose 1 answer:
B
Freedom of the press
Freedom of assembly
The free exercise clause
The establishment clause

Answer 1

The case has the constitutional protection of freedom of the press in common with New York Times Co. v. United States (1971)

Step-by-step explanation:

The case described in the question focuses on the constitutional protection of freedom of the press. Similar to the New York Times Co. v. United States case, where the press published classified documents regarding the Vietnam War, both cases highlight the importance of the First Amendment freedom of the press clause. In both cases, the Supreme Court emphasized the public's right to know and the press's role in providing information to the public.

Learn more about Freedom of the press