206k views
3 votes
Consider this claim:

When a book is made into a movie, you should read the book before seeing the movie.
Now consider how someone might argue against this. Which sentence presents a
counterclaim to the above claim?
It's a waste of time to read a book when you can see the movie in a couple
hours.
Books typically include more details about the characters and plot of a story
than movie versions.

User Shishya
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

The counterclaim to the claim that you should read the book before seeing the movie is that it's a waste of time to read a book when you can see the movie in a couple of hours.


Step-by-step explanation:

The sentence that presents a counterclaim to the claim is:

It's a waste of time to read a book when you can see the movie in a couple hours.

This sentence argues against the claim by suggesting that reading a book is a waste of time when the movie adaptation can be watched in a shorter duration. It implies that watching the movie is a more efficient use of time than reading the book.


Learn more about Reading books vs watching movies

User Jeffrey Greenham
by
8.1k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.