206k views
3 votes
Consider this claim:

When a book is made into a movie, you should read the book before seeing the movie.
Now consider how someone might argue against this. Which sentence presents a
counterclaim to the above claim?
It's a waste of time to read a book when you can see the movie in a couple
hours.
Books typically include more details about the characters and plot of a story
than movie versions.

User Shishya
by
8.0k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

The counterclaim to the claim that you should read the book before seeing the movie is that it's a waste of time to read a book when you can see the movie in a couple of hours.


Step-by-step explanation:

The sentence that presents a counterclaim to the claim is:

It's a waste of time to read a book when you can see the movie in a couple hours.

This sentence argues against the claim by suggesting that reading a book is a waste of time when the movie adaptation can be watched in a shorter duration. It implies that watching the movie is a more efficient use of time than reading the book.


Learn more about Reading books vs watching movies

User Jeffrey Greenham
by
7.7k points