51.5k views
0 votes
Abe

oid(0);
1
2
3
4
5
6
Which statement best describes the difference between the aesthetic appeal of the two versions of The War of
the Worlds?
The written text relies on vivid description; the radio adaptation uses description and soothing narration.
The written text relies on vivid description; the radio adaptation uses frenzied dialogue and sound effects.
The written text relies on narration; the radio adaptation uses an upbeat tone and characterization.
The written text relies on narration; the radio adaptation uses setting details and research.
DELL
TIME REMAINING
49:54
Cerrar sesión
LA
1 de n

1 Answer

7 votes

Final answer:

The difference in aesthetic appeal between the two versions of The War of the Worlds lies in the use of vivid description in the written text and frenzied dialogue and sound effects in the radio adaptation.


Step-by-step explanation:

The statement that best describes the difference between the aesthetic appeal of the two versions of The War of the Worlds is: The written text relies on vivid description; the radio adaptation uses frenzied dialogue and sound effects.


Learn more about Aesthetic appeal in The War of the Worlds

User Oshirowanen
by
8.3k points