Question

1. As Huxley summarizes his ideas, the dialogic quality of the novel is heightened. This is demonstrated in the dialogue between John and Mustapha Mond. The argumentative nature of their discussion appears in four ways:

A.) Their goal is to arrive at truth by exposing the contradictions in each other's argument.
B.) Parts of the discussion are in a question and answer format.
C.) There is a logical structure, which holds their continuous argument together.
D.) Each man voices a set of principles.
The two sets of principles are in opposition, creating an interplay of contradictory principles. Find an example of each of the points listed above.
You can quote some of the dialogue in your answer.

Answer 1

The dialogic nature of Huxley's novel Brave New World is demonstrated through the discussion between John and Mustapha Mond, with examples of goal to expose contradictions, question and answer format, logical structure, and opposing principles.

Step-by-step explanation:

The subject of the question is English literature, specifically the novel Brave New World by Aldous Huxley. The student is analyzing the dialogic quality of the novel, focusing on the discussion between John and Mustapha Mond. Each of the four points mentioned are ways in which the argumentative nature of the dialogue is evident. Here are examples of each:

1. A.) In the discussion, John and Mustapha Mond aim to arrive at truth by exposing contradictions in each other's arguments. For example, John challenges Mond's philosophy by pointing out the lack of authentic emotions in the World State: 'But I don't want comfort. I want God, I want poetry, I want real danger, I want freedom, I want goodness. I want sin.'
2. B.) Parts of the discussion take the form of question and answer, such as when John questions Mond about the suppression of art and science: 'But why is it so essential that it should be suppressed?'
3. C.) The discussion between John and Mustapha Mond follows a logical structure, with each point building upon the previous one. This helps to maintain the continuity of their argument. For example, they start with a discussion on truth and move on to the role of happiness in society.
4. D.) Both John and Mustapha Mond voice their respective sets of principles that are in opposition to each other. John values individuality and the pursuit of higher ideals, while Mustapha Mond upholds the stability and happiness provided by the World State. A clear example of this can be seen in John's statement: 'I'd rather be unhappy than have the happiness of the whole world on my shoulders.'

Learn more about dialogic quality of Brave New World