44.9k views
2 votes
O

O
Critics of firebombs argued that they:
were too inaccurate.
were too expensive.
would lead to too many civilian casualties.
would ensure a U.S. victory.

User Bruha
by
7.6k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

The question asks about the criticism of firebombs in history.


Step-by-step explanation:

The subject of this question is History.

Critics of firebombs argued that they were too inaccurate, too expensive, and would lead to too many civilian casualties.

These critics did not believe that firebombs would ensure a U.S. victory.


Learn more about Criticism of firebombs in history

User Scott Gribben
by
8.2k points