Question

Some supporters of the decision considered it a victory for free speech because

corporations cannot be refused the right to spread their political views, and that they have First
Amendment rights to pay for ads that support their preferred candidate. It was Freedom of
speech and expression.
2. Identify two reasons why opponents of the decision think it is bad for democracy. (2 points)
Opponents argued that it gave wealthy corporations an upper hand in controlling the
outcome of elections. They also argue that the ruling allows corporations to use unfair ways to
influence the behavior of the candidates they help elect.
3. How do you view this decision's impact on election reform and free speech? Write a
paragraph of at least five sentences explaining why you think the decision is a step in the right
direction or a serious mistake. Include support for your position and a statement countering the
argument of the opposing side. (6 points)

Answer 1

The Supreme Court decision is seen as a victory for free speech by supporters, while opponents argue it gives wealthy corporations an unfair advantage and allows them to influence candidates unfairly.

Step-by-step explanation:

Supporters of the decision considered it a victory for free speech because they believed that corporations should not be denied the right to express their political views and that they have the First Amendment right to fund advertisements supporting their preferred candidates. This was seen as a protection of freedom of speech and expression.

1. Opponents of the decision believe it is bad for democracy because it gives wealthy corporations an unfair advantage in controlling election outcomes.
2. They also argue that the ruling allows corporations to use unfair tactics to influence the behavior of candidates they help elect.

I view this decision's impact on election reform and free speech as a serious mistake. While it is important to protect free speech, granting corporations unlimited influence in elections can undermine the democratic process. The decision enables wealthy corporations to have disproportionate control over political outcomes, potentially drowning out the voices of ordinary citizens.

Learn more about Supreme Court decision on free speech and democracy