Answer:
Advantages of Marshall's "bread" interpretation of the Constitution:
1. Consistency: By interpreting the Constitution as a living document, Marshall's "bread" interpretation allows for legal precedent to be established, which fosters consistency and stability in the legal system.
2. Interpretations based on present circumstances: Marshall's "bread" interpretation takes into account the changing needs and conditions of society, allowing for interpretations of the Constitution to reflect the modern day context instead of being stuck in the past. This allows for flexibility and adaptability.
The disadvantages of Marshall's "bread" interpretation of the Constitution are:
1. The possibility of political bias and influence: Marshall's "bread" interpretation allows for judges to interpret the Constitution based on current circumstances and conditions.
2. Lack of predictability: The "bread" interpretation can lead to a lack of predictability in the legal system, as interpretations and precedents can be changed at any time. This makes it hard for stakeholders and legal professionals to anticipate and plan ahead with certainty. This lack of predictability can also lead to legal inefficiencies and uncertainties.