Question

Which of the following was NOT true about the Dred Scott case?

The US Supreme Court ruled Dred Scott legally free but this was nullified by the State of
Missouri Supreme Court
Chief Justice Roger Taney ruled that the Missouri Compromise had been unconstitutional all
along
O A jury of white men in a Missouri court originally ruled Dred Scott legally free
Chief Justice Roger Taney ruled that slaves were chattel, that is full property of their masters,
with no legal rights

Answer 1

The Dred Scott case involved a jury ruling Dred Scott legally free and Chief Justice Roger Taney declaring slaves as property.

Step-by-step explanation:

The correct statement is: A jury of white men in a Missouri court originally ruled Dred Scott legally free. In the Dred Scott case, Dred Scott, an enslaved African American, sued for his freedom in 1857. The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Roger Taney, ruled that Scott was not entitled to his freedom and that slaves were property, not citizens.

Taney also ruled that the Missouri Compromise, which prohibited slavery in certain territories, was unconstitutional. This decision further entrenched the institution of slavery and heightened tensions between the North and the South.

Learn more about Dred Scott case