Final answer:
The recording from June 23, 1972, is considered stronger evidence than testimonies because it directly captures the conversations and discussions related to the Watergate scandal.
Step-by-step explanation:
The recording from June 23, 1972, is considered stronger evidence than Haldeman's or Dean's sworn testimony because it directly captures the conversations and discussions related to the Watergate scandal. The recording is an actual audio evidence of the events that took place, providing authenticity and a clear picture of what transpired. On the other hand, testimonies can be influenced by human biases, faulty recall, or an individual's motivation to protect themselves or others.
Learn more about Watergate scandal