Answer:
Title: Reflective Analysis on "The War on Democracy" and "Beyond Elections"
1. The relationship between Latin America and the United States revealed through both documentaries sheds light on several significant aspects. First, the films emphasize the United States' historical involvement in supporting authoritarian regimes for its own interests. For instance, in "The War on Democracy," the documentary showcases the CIA's role in orchestrating the overthrow of democratically elected governments in Chile and Venezuela. Similarly, "Beyond Elections" highlights the US support for the brutal military dictatorship in Guatemala, which led to immense human rights violations.
Additionally, both films emphasize how the United States frequently interferes in Latin American affairs to counter perceived threats to its regional dominance. In "The War on Democracy," the U.S. government's efforts to undermine progressive leaders, such as Salvador Allende in Chile and Hugo Chavez in Venezuela, demonstrate a consistent pattern of U.S. intervention aimed at securing control over natural resources and markets. Similarly, in "Beyond Elections," the documentary highlights the US involvement in the Honduran coup, showcasing the influence of American corporations, particularly agribusiness, in supporting the coup against a democratically elected president.
2. Personally, I find U.S. interventions in Latin America highly troubling and morally questionable. Both films vividly depict the devastating consequences of these interventions, including widespread human rights abuses, economic exploitation, and the erosion of democratic institutions. The United States' perceived entitlement to interfere in the political affairs of sovereign nations undermines the democratic aspirations of Latin American countries, hindering their ability to pursue self-determination and social progress.
3. The documentaries provide valuable insights into the various Latin American countries highlighted. In "The War on Democracy," the film highlights the struggles faced by Chile and Venezuela. In the case of Chile, it uncovers the brutal dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet, supported by the United States, which inflicted widespread torture and repression. Similarly, in Venezuela, the documentary showcases the efforts to undermine the democratically elected government of Hugo Chavez, exposing the external pressures and disinformation campaigns aimed at destabilizing the country.
In "Beyond Elections," the documentaries feature Bolivia and Honduras. In Bolivia, the film illustrates the inspiring rise of Evo Morales, the country's first indigenous president, who sought to address historical inequalities and empower marginalized communities. Conversely, in Honduras, the documentary raises concerns about the U.S.-backed coup against President Manuel Zelaya, illustrating the subsequent human rights abuses and the silencing of dissent.
4. Both films significantly contribute to a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of democracy. They challenge the conventional perception of democracy solely as periodic elections. Instead, they emphasize the importance of democratic principles such as social justice, accountability, and participatory decision-making. By highlighting U.S. interventions and their impact on democratically elected governments, the documentaries highlight how democracy can be undermined when external forces manipulate political processes and promote their interests over the will of the people.
5. What surprised me in "The War on Democracy" was the immense extent of U.S. involvement and manipulation, covert and overt, in Latin American countries, undermining their democratic aspirations. It was disheartening to see how often the United States supported and enabled brutal dictatorships in its quest for power and control. Similarly, in "Beyond Elections," I was astonished by the extent of corporate influence in political decision-making processes, particularly in the context of agribusiness in Honduras, which eroded democracy and led to increased inequality and human rights violations.
In conclusion, these documentaries profoundly illustrate the complex relationship between Latin America and the United States, exposing U.S. interventions and their consequences for democracy in the region. They highlight the importance of understanding the historical context and the detrimental effects of interventionism, while underscoring the need to uphold democratic principles that transcend periodic elections.
Step-by-step explanation:
ESPERO TE AYUDE EN TU DEBER