Final answer:
If congressional districting were organized by strictly geographic principles instead of by the political process in state legislatures, gerrymandering would be minimized and districts would be more representative of the population.
Step-by-step explanation:
If congressional districting were organized by strictly geographic principles instead of by the political process in state legislatures, the political process would significantly change. Currently, the political party in power has the ability to draw congressional districts in a way that benefits their party, a practice known as gerrymandering. However, if districting were based solely on geographic principles, political manipulation would be minimized and districts would be more representative of the actual population.
Under a geographic districting process, districts would be drawn in a way that reflects the natural boundaries and demographics of the area. This would mean that districts would be more compact and contiguous, without weird shapes designed to favor one political party over another.
In this scenario, the political process would likely become more competitive as candidates would have to appeal to a broader range of constituents. Additionally, the representation of different political ideologies would likely be more balanced, leading to a more inclusive and democratic political system.
Learn more about congressional districting