Question

Kind on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin, if such discrimination or segregation is or purports to

be required by any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, rule, or order of a State or any agency or political subdivision
thereof.
-It is unlawful to deny the right of any individual to vote in any Federal election because of an error or omission on
any record or paper relating to any application, registration, or other act requisite to voting, if such error or omission
is not material in determining whether such individual is qualified under State law to vote in such election.
--The Civil Rights Act of 1964
What is the BEST conclusion that can be drawn from this excerpt from the Civil Rights Act of 1964?
A
The federal government secured passage of this legislation because all of the states supported
it.
4* B
4x C
D
The federal government intended to put an end to segregation and discrimination in the United
States.
The southern states were successful in blocking the federal government from desegregating
public facilities.
The southern states were able to reach a compromise with northern Republicans in order to
secure passage of the Act.

Answer 1

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 reflects the federal government's aim to end segregation and discrimination.

Step-by-step explanation:

The BEST conclusion that can be drawn from this excerpt from the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is that the federal government intended to put an end to segregation and discrimination in the United States. The excerpt states that discrimination or segregation based on race, color, religion, or national origin is unlawful, even if it is required by state law. This highlights the federal government's commitment to combating any form of discriminatory practices. The Act also emphasizes the protection of voting rights and prohibits the denial of voting rights due to non-material errors or omissions on voting-related records or papers.

Learn more about The Civil Rights Act of 1964