Question

The Supreme Court's interpretation in Medellin v. Texas was that state

courts are obligated to follow the decisions of international judicial bodies
like the World Court.
O True
O False

Answer 1

The Supreme Court's interpretation in Medellin v. Texas was that state courts are not obligated to follow the decisions of international judicial bodies like the World Court.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Supreme Court's interpretation in Medellin v. Texas was that state courts are not obligated to follow the decisions of international judicial bodies like the World Court. In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that the World Court's decision was not directly enforceable in the United States without implementing legislation from Congress.

This case involved an individual who argued that his conviction and sentence in Texas violated an international treaty. However, the Supreme Court held that the treaty did not become domestic law without congressional action, and state courts were not bound to follow it.

Therefore, the statement that state courts are obligated to follow the decisions of international judicial bodies like the World Court is false.

Learn more about Supreme Court's interpretation in Medellin v. Texas