In this compare-contrast essay, I have chosen to analyze two different reports on the issue of climate change. The first report is a video from a reputable news website like CNN, and the second report is a written news article from The New York Times. Both sources address the same issue, but I will delve into the biases present in each.
The video report from CNN tends to emphasize the urgency of climate change, highlighting the potential catastrophic consequences and the need for immediate action. It often interviews scientists and environmentalists who stress the severity of the problem. On the other hand, The New York Times article takes a more measured approach, presenting a balanced view of the issue. It includes both the concerns about climate change and the counterarguments, giving voice to skeptics and those who may not view it as an imminent threat. In my analysis, I will explore how these differences in presentation and tone reveal biases and the potential impact of these biases on the audience's perception of the issue.
In conclusion, this essay will shed light on the distinct biases exhibited in two different mediums, a video report from CNN and a written article from The New York Times, while addressing the issue of climate change. By examining the biases within each medium, we can better understand the role of media in shaping public opinion and its influence on how we perceive and respond to critical issues such as climate change.