Question

Why might ocean floors be better than continental locations for studying

long-term changes in the size of ice sheets?
►View Available Hint(s)
Ocean floors have been less extensively cored than land
areas.
Continental records are fragmented and discontinuous,
missing parts of the climate record.
Ocean floors are much older than continental areas, thus
providing a longer period from which to collect data.
Ocean basins were created by ice sheets, making them more
suitable locations to collect data.
Scientists do not need permission to take cores from the sea
floor in international waters.

Answer 1

Ocean floors may be better for studying long-term changes in ice sheets due to less extensive coring, more complete climate records, and longer periods of data.

Step-by-step explanation:

Ocean floors may be better than continental locations for studying long-term changes in the size of ice sheets for several reasons. Firstly, ocean floors have been less extensively cored than land areas, meaning there is more potential for new and valuable data to be collected. Secondly, continental records are often fragmented and discontinuous, missing parts of the climate record, whereas ocean floors provide a more continuous and complete geological record. Lastly, ocean floors are much older than continental areas, offering a longer period from which to gather data and study changes in ice sheet sizes.

Learn more about Studying long-term changes in ice sheets