Question

Many state legislators have decided to take on crime and other forms of delinquency in schools through zero tolerance policies. They believe that identifying

and removing
disruptive or poorly
performing
students will improve the overall quality of the school. What does this argument fail to address?
A.
B.
PO
D.
te e ad a to be a
to as a sau se pode ser posted a
e as a sa te sie es o no a
5130 шоол зишо от auapnis e sageou uw ains ag of fem ou staut
Subm
a per te te pare a

Answer 1

The argument fails to address unintended consequences of zero tolerance policies, underlying causes of delinquency, and alternative approaches to addressing disruptive behavior.

Step-by-step explanation:

The argument fails to address several important aspects:

1. Unintended consequences: Zero tolerance policies may result in disproportionate punishment and criminalization of minor offenses, leading to higher suspension and expulsion rates among certain student populations.
2. Factors contributing to delinquency: The argument disregards potential underlying causes of disruptive behavior, such as poverty, lack of access to mental health support, or experiences of trauma.
3. Alternative approaches: It overlooks alternative strategies that focus on prevention, intervention, and restorative justice to address delinquency while keeping students in the educational environment.

Learn more about Critiques of zero tolerance policies in schools