Question

Announcements

Modules
Grades
Office 365
Send on Remind
Quizzes
Discussions
Assignments
Pages
Question 18
5 pts
In the late 1780s, Daniel Shays and several thousand veterans took up arms against
the Massachusetts state government and the federal government after Massachusetts
suspended certain civil rights. Despite knowing that an armed rebellion was occurring,
no troops were sent to meet the rebels in battle for several weeks. Why did the
federal government fail to respond to the crisis?
O Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government could not declare war on enemy
groups.
O Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government could not raise money to pay for
soldiers.
O Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government was only authorized to attack
foreign enemies.
O Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government was only authorized to make
economic decisions.
Question 19
5 pts

Answer 1

The federal government failed to respond to the armed rebellion due to financial limitations under the Articles of Confederation, leading to the need for a new constitution.

Step-by-step explanation:

The subject of the question is History.

The federal government failed to respond to the crisis because under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government could not raise money to pay for soldiers. This meant that they did not have the financial means to mobilize troops and meet the rebels in battle.

The rebellion led by Daniel Shays was a significant event in the late 1780s, highlighting the flaws of the Articles of Confederation and ultimately leading to the creation of the United States Constitution.

Learn more about The failure of the federal government to respond to the armed rebellion