Question

A photograph from French West Africa during the 1940s shows a sign written in two languages. In French, it says "Restaurants and shopping district." In the local language, it says "Carry identification at all times." Which of the following statements is a reasonable inference based on the above information? O A. Only the French were allowed citizenship. B. The French did not understand the local language. C. Africans were subject to different rules than the French were. OD. The French had a policy of respect for local populations. SUBMIT​

Answer 1

C. Africans were subject to different rules than the French were.

Step-by-step explanation:

a reasonable inference is that Africans were subject to different rules than the French were.

This inference can be drawn from the fact that the sign in the local language specifically instructs people to "Carry identification at all times." This implies that the local population was required to have identification on them, suggesting that they may have been subject to stricter regulations or surveillance compared to the French.

On the other hand, the French sign simply states "Restaurants and shopping district," without any mention of identification. This suggests that the French population did not have the same requirement, indicating a difference in the rules that applied to Africans and the French in French West Africa during the 1940s.

While it is not possible to conclusively determine the exact nature of these different rules based on the given information, it is reasonable to infer that there was a distinction in the treatment of Africans and the French, indicating that they were subject to different regulations.