Question

Which of the following actions would probably

NOT be protected by the constitutional guarantee
of freedom of speech and freedom of the press?
A. A newspaper columnist falsely accusing a
city official of stealing funds
B. A senator questioning the qualifications of a
presidential appointee
C. A radio commentator raising doubts about
the ability of a political candidate
D. An editorial writer criticizing the policies of
a police chief

Answer 1

A newspaper columnist falsely accusing a city official of stealing funds would probably NOT be protected by the constitutional guarantee of freedom of speech and freedom of the press.

Step-by-step explanation:

The correct answer is A. A newspaper columnist falsely accusing a city official of stealing funds would probably NOT be protected by the constitutional guarantee of freedom of speech and freedom of the press.

While freedom of speech and freedom of the press are important constitutional rights in the United States, they are not absolute. There are certain limits and exceptions to these rights, and one of them is making false statements that harm someone's reputation, which is known as defamation. Accusing someone of a crime they did not commit, like stealing funds, could be considered defamatory if it is false and harms the person's reputation.

Learn more about freedom of speech and freedom of the press