Question

Which statement best explains how the Supreme Court interpreted the Fourth Amendment's protection from search

and seizure in school? (1 point)
O They said that school officials have to have probable cause.
O They said that school officials can search whenever they want.
O They said that school officials only need reasonable suspicion
O They said that students have the same protection as citizens.

Answer 1

The Supreme Court ruled that school officials only need reasonable suspicion to conduct searches in school.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement that best explains how the Supreme Court interpreted the Fourth Amendment's protection from search and seizure in school is: They said that school officials only need reasonable suspicion. In the landmark case New Jersey v. T.L.O. (1985), the Supreme Court ruled that school officials can search students if they have reasonable suspicion, rather than requiring the higher standard of probable cause. This allows for a balance between protecting students' privacy rights and maintaining a safe and orderly learning environment.

Learn more about Fourth Amendment's protection from search and seizure in school