80.5k views
2 votes
Looking at the ways that Southern estates were divided, Dr. Jones-Rogers argued that

O daughters and sons got equal shares of the slaves in the estate
O daughters were given slaves more than any other form of property
O daughters got a smaller share of the enslaved people from the estate typically
O daughters and sons often fought over how many slaves they each would receive from the estate

User Dmfrey
by
7.4k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

Daughters received a smaller share of the enslaved people from the estate typically.


Step-by-step explanation:

In the context of how Southern estates were divided, Dr. Jones-Rogers argued that daughters got a smaller share of the enslaved people from the estate typically. This means that when dividing the enslaved people among the heirs, daughters received a smaller portion compared to their brothers. While other forms of property may have been divided more equally, daughters generally received fewer slaves.


Learn more about Division of Southern estates

User Nikhil Wagh
by
7.1k points