Final answer:
Implied powers are powers not explicitly stated in the Constitution but derived from necessary and proper clauses, and they have been deemed constitutional by the Supreme Court. This does not give southern planters control of the national wealth and does not make the government too strong or limited to the President's control of the economy.
Step-by-step explanation:
Implied powers are powers not explicitly stated in the Constitution but derived from necessary and proper clauses. While some argued that the use of implied powers was unconstitutional, the Supreme Court case of McCulloch v. Maryland in 1819 established the validity of implied powers. The decision stated that the federal government has the authority to exercise implied powers as long as they are necessary and proper for carrying out its enumerated powers.
It is important to note that implied powers were not specific to southern planters nor did they give them control of the national wealth. The ability to exercise implied powers was given to the federal government as a whole, not just the President. Implied powers were designed to ensure the functioning and effectiveness of the government.
Therefore, the statement that the use of implied powers would make the government too strong or that only the President could control the economy is not accurate.
Learn more about Implied powers and their constitutional validity