Question

Read the passage from the opinion of the court in Dred

Scott v. Sandford, written by Justice Taney.
The question before us is, whether the class of persons
described in the plea in abatement compose a portion
of this people, and are constituent members of this
sovereignty? We think they are not, and that they are
not included, and were not intended to be included,
under the word "citizens" in the Constitution, and can
therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which
that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of
the United States. On the contrary, they were at that
time considered as a subordinate and inferior class of
beings, who had been subjugated by the dominant
race, and, whether emancipated or not, yet remained
subject to their authority, and had no rights or privileges
but such as those who held the power and the
Government might choose to grant them.
Which statement best serves as a counterclaim to the
claim in this passage?
O Taney fails to provide any actual evidence for his
statements that Black people were universally
considered inferior.
O Taney cannot use states' rights to claim that the
plaintiff is not a citizen, because citizenship is
federal.
O Taney's argument that emancipated people were still
controlled by White people is false because they
were free.
O Taney's argument that Blacks were not citizens is
false because their ancestors were forced to come
here.

Answer 1

The passage from the opinion of the court in Dred Scott v. Sandford raises questions about the status of Black people and their rights as citizens. The counterclaim to the passage suggests that Taney's statements lack evidence.

Step-by-step explanation:

The subject of this question is Social Studies, specifically the Dred Scott v. Sandford case. In this case, the question of whether the class of persons described in the plea in abatement compose a portion of the people and are constituent members of the sovereignty is being addressed. The excerpt from Justice Taney's opinion in the Supreme Court ruling provides his perspective on the matter.

The counterclaim to the claim in this passage is that Taney fails to provide any actual evidence for his statements that Black people were universally considered inferior. This argument suggests that the opinion lacks factual support and may be based on biased assumptions rather than concrete evidence. Further examination and research would be necessary to fully evaluate the validity of Taney's claims.

Learn more about Dred Scott v. Sandford