76.8k views
1 vote
In Dred Scott v. Sandford, why did Scott have no legal right to sue for his freedom,

according to the Supreme Court?
a) He was not permitted to enter the Supreme Court building.
b) He could neither read nor write.
c) He did not bring his suit from the state in which he was enslaved.
d) According to the Constitution, Scott was not a citizen.

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

In Dred Scott v. Sandford, Scott was denied the legal right to sue for his freedom because he was not considered a citizen according to the Constitution.


Step-by-step explanation:

In Dred Scott v. Sandford, Scott had no legal right to sue for his freedom because according to the Supreme Court, he was not a citizen according to the Constitution. The Court ruled that enslaved individuals, like Scott, were considered property and not citizens, therefore they did not have the legal standing to sue in federal courts.


Learn more about Dred Scott v. Sandford

User Vishnu Sureshkumar
by
7.9k points