Question

PLEASE HELP ASAP, EXAM QUESTION "I make no doubt, but your State has turned its views towards forming some obstacles against the enemy's ships and tenders [small supply ships], which may go up your rivers in quest of provisons, or for the purpose of destroying your towns. If you have depended on batteries [artillery units] to prevent them without any other obstruction, a trial of the matter has taught us to believe, that it will be altogether ineffectual; as, when under sail, with wind and tide in their favor, any damage they might receive from a battery will be of very little consequence."

What does Washington think of using artillery to fight off British ships?
A. Artillery may accidentally cause destruction of the towns.
B. Artillery is the best method of keeping the British at a distance.
C. Artillery will only be effective if the ships have already set sail.
D. Artillery will not be effective against moving ships.​

Answer 1

Based on the provided text, Washington's opinion of using artillery to fight off British ships can be summarized as:

D. Artillery will not be effective against moving ships.

Washington suggests that depending solely on batteries (artillery units) to prevent British ships from advancing up the rivers will be "altogether ineffectual." He believes that when the British ships are under sail with the wind and tide in their favor, any damage they might receive from a battery will be of little consequence, indicating that artillery is not an effective means of stopping moving ships.

Answer 2

D. Artillery will not be effective against moving ships.

Step-by-step explanation:

He mentions that using artillery alone would be ineffectual because, when British ships are under sail with favorable wind and tide conditions, any damage they might receive from a battery (artillery) would be of little consequence.

In other words, artillery is not the best method to prevent moving ships.