Answer:
The Mojares Panel, which was convened in 1988, was established to investigate and address various issues and concerns raised by critics and opposition groups regarding the conduct of the 1987 presidential election in the Philippines. One of the key arguments put forth by some critics was the so-called "Longtitude" argument.
The "Longtitude" argument was not a valid measure, according to the Mojares Panel, for several reasons:
Lack of Validity: The "Longtitude" argument was considered by the panel as lacking any scientific or legal validity. It was seen as a pseudoscientific and irrational claim that did not have any foundation in geography, cartography, or election law.
Intentional Distraction: The panel found that the "Longtitude" argument was being used by some groups as a distraction or diversion from the legitimate issues and concerns related to the election. It was seen as an attempt to obfuscate the real issues at hand.
Misinterpretation of Concepts: The "Longtitude" argument was based on a misinterpretation of the concept of longitude (not "Longtitude"). Longitude refers to the east-west measurement on the Earth's surface, while the argument seemed to misconstrue it as a geographical measure relevant to the election.
Lack of Legal Basis: The argument did not have a legal basis or relevance in the context of election law in the Philippines. Election processes and results are determined by legal and constitutional provisions, not by arbitrary geographic concepts.
In essence, the Mojares Panel considered the "Longtitude" argument as a baseless and frivolous claim that did not contribute to a meaningful discussion of the election issues. As a result, it was not deemed a valid measure or argument by the panel. The panel's findings aimed to clarify and address genuine concerns related to the election process and results in a more rational and legal manner.
Step-by-step explanation: