179k views
2 votes
Bob didn't wear his lucky T-shirt to class so he failed his chemistry exam? This best illustrate which fallacy mutiple choice pitfall 7 poor survey methods post hoc reasoning none than one of the above

2 Answers

3 votes
It is not likely that not wearing a specific t-shirt is the reason that bob failed. Bob likely failed for some outside reason like that he did not prepare enough.
0 votes

Answer:

The scenario "Bob didn't wear his lucky T-shirt to class, so he failed his chemistry exam" illustrates the fallacy of "post hoc reasoning."

Post hoc reasoning, also known as "post hoc, ergo propter hoc" (after this, therefore because of this), is a logical fallacy where one assumes that because one event followed another, the first event caused the second event. In this case, the assumption that not wearing the lucky T-shirt caused Bob to fail his chemistry exam is an example of post hoc reasoning, as there may be many other factors contributing to his exam performance.

:)

User Saqib Omer
by
7.8k points