Question

Revision 1. The committee that was planning the 2010 World Cup, originally decided that the 64 games would be played in South Africa's nine provinces, according to this division: No games were scheduled for Limpopo or Mpumalanga. 1. a) Which province was going to host Western Cape 12% the most games? 1. b) How many games were due to be played in North West province? 1. c) Calculate the size (in degrees) of the Northern Cape's sector. 1. d) The committee was heavily criticised for their plan. Why do you think this was the case? Give two possible reasons. Number of games in each province Free State 6% North West Province 6% Eastern Cape 13% Northern Cape 13% Gauteng 31% KwaZulu-Natal 19% (2) ly used modes (1​

Answer 1

1. a) According to the given division, the Western Cape was due to host 12% of the games.

1. b) The number of games due to be played in the North West province would be 6% of the total.

1. c) To calculate the size of the Northern Cape's sector in degrees, we need to find the percentage it represents out of the whole circle, which is 360 degrees.

Given that the Northern Cape is due to host 13% of the games, the size of its sector would be:

Size of Northern Cape's sector = (13/100) * 360 degrees

= 46.8 degrees

Therefore, the size of the Northern Cape's sector would be approximately 46.8 degrees.

1. d) The committee was heavily criticized for their plan due to several possible reasons. Two possible reasons could be:

1) Inequality in distribution: The committee's decision to exclude certain provinces, such as Limpopo and Mpumalanga, from hosting any games may have been seen as unfair. This could have led to accusations of bias or lack of equal opportunities.

2) Economic impact: By not including certain provinces, the committee may have missed an opportunity to stimulate economic growth and development in those areas. Hosting the World Cup could have brought significant tourism, infrastructure investment, and increased employment opportunities, which may have been perceived as a missed chance for these provinces.

These are just two potential reasons, and there could be additional factors that contributed to the criticism of the committee's plan.