54.5k views
0 votes
Dimitri says that 22 equals 7.33. Is the 3 correct? Why or why not?

Dimitri says that 22 equals 7.33. Is the 3 correct? Why or why not?-example-1
User Meises
by
7.5k points

1 Answer

7 votes

Answer:

No, the statement made by Dimitri that 22 equals 7.33 is incorrect. The number 22 is not equal to 7.33.

To understand why this statement is incorrect, we need to examine the nature of the numbers involved. In this case, 22 is an integer, while 7.33 is a decimal or a floating-point number.

Integers are whole numbers that do not have any fractional or decimal parts. They can be positive, negative, or zero. In contrast, decimal numbers or floating-point numbers can have both whole and fractional parts. They are represented using a decimal point.

In the given statement, Dimitri equates the integer 22 with the decimal number 7.33. This is incorrect because these two numbers represent different values. The integer 22 represents a whole quantity of 22 units, while the decimal number 7.33 represents a value that is greater than 7 but less than 8.

To further illustrate this, we can compare the magnitudes of these numbers. The integer 22 falls between the integers 21 and 23 on the number line, while the decimal number 7.33 falls between the integers 7 and 8 on the number line.

Therefore, it is clear that Dimitri's statement that 22 equals 7.33 is incorrect as these two numbers represent different values and do not have an equal numerical relationship.

Explanation:

User Sunny Tambi
by
7.9k points