Answer:
In paragraph 9, the author presents arguments against the notion that recent technological advancements have resulted in improved pay or positions for the majority of workers. The evidence provided by the author to support this view includes:
1. Income inequality: The author highlights the increasing income inequality as a result of technological advancements. They argue that while a small number of individuals in high-skilled and high-paying jobs may benefit from technology, the majority of workers are left behind. This is supported by data showing a widening wealth gap between the top earners and the rest of the workforce.
2. Job displacement: The author points out that technological advancements often lead to job displacement, particularly in industries where automation can replace human labor. They argue that this displacement can result in job losses and reduced bargaining power for workers, leading to stagnant wages or even wage decreases. The evidence for this claim can be found in studies and reports documenting the impact of automation on various sectors, such as manufacturing and retail.
3. Skills mismatch: The author argues that technological advancements require workers to possess specific skills and knowledge, which may not be readily available to the majority of workers. They contend that this skills mismatch can lead to a lack of opportunities for career advancement or higher-paying positions for many individuals. Evidence supporting this argument can be found in surveys and research highlighting the growing demand for specialized skills in emerging fields like artificial intelligence and data science.
Overall, the author provides evidence suggesting that recent advances in technology have not resulted in better pay or positions for the majority of workers. Instead, they argue that income inequality, job displacement, and skills mismatch are some of the factors contributing to this disparity.
Step-by-step explanation: