Answer:
Political power was concentrated in Charleston and the lowcountry. The backcountry lacked representation in the colonial Assembly, courts to prosecute criminals, and the Anglican establishment necessary to establishing a deferential social order.
Step-by-step explanation:
The political representation between the Backcountry and the Lowcountry in the 13 colonies' time was different due to several factors.
1. Population Distribution: The Backcountry had a smaller population compared to the Lowcountry. This meant that the Backcountry had fewer representatives in political bodies, such as colonial legislatures.
2. Economic Interests: The Backcountry was primarily agrarian, with settlers engaged in subsistence farming and small-scale production. In contrast, the Lowcountry had a more developed economy, centered around cash crops like tobacco, rice, and indigo. The economic interests of the Lowcountry were often prioritized in political decision-making.
3. Social and Cultural Differences: The Backcountry was composed of settlers from various backgrounds, including Scots-Irish and German immigrants. They often had different social and cultural values compared to the Lowcountry elite, who were predominantly of English descent and had established plantations. These differences influenced political perspectives and priorities.
4. Geographic Challenges: The Backcountry was located further inland, making communication and travel more difficult compared to the Lowcountry, which had better access to ports and trade routes. This geographical disadvantage may have contributed to a lack of political representation for the Backcountry.
Overall, the Backcountry had limited political representation compared to the Lowcountry due to factors such as population distribution, economic interests, social and cultural differences, and geographic challenges. These disparities in representation often led to conflicts and tensions between the two regions during the colonial era.
The political representation differed between the Backcountry and the Lowcountry during the time of the 13 colonies. In the Backcountry, there was a lack of representation in the colonial Assembly, which meant that the people living there did not have much say in the political decisions. On the other hand, in the Lowcountry, particularly in Charleston, there was more political power and representation in the colonial Assembly. This meant that the people in the Lowcountry had more influence in decision-making and had a voice in shaping the political landscape. Additionally, the backcountry also lacked the necessary institutions like courts and the Anglican establishment, which further limited their political representation.