Final answer:
Woodrow Wilson's characterization of World War I as a 'war to end all wars' ultimately led to frustration and bitterness when the outcomes of the war did not live up to these lofty ideals. The hardships of the war and the perceived harshness of the post-war treaties led to dissatisfaction that eventually precipitated World War II.
Step-by-step explanation:
Woodrow Wilson's characterization of World War I as "a war to end all wars" initially inspired hope for a more peaceful future. However, as the war ended, it became clear that the peace was not as comprehensive or as enduring as Wilson had promised. The toll of the war, the perceived harshness of the Treaty of Versailles, and the failure of Wilson's League of Nations concept all contributed to the lingering bitterness, anger, and frustration that followed the war.
The extensive damage, loss of life, and political changes that the war wrought led to instability and dissatisfaction, particularly in Germany, where the terms of peace were perceived as overly punitive. This dissatisfaction paved the way for the rise of radical ideologies and eventually led to World War II.
Learn more about Post-WWI dissatisfaction