Question

How would you characterize pro- and antislavery forces in 1820? What might explain the widespread belief that the issue of slavery had been resolved with the passage of the Missouri Compromise?

Answer 1

In 1820, pro- and antislavery forces held different views on the expansion of slavery. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 temporarily resolved the issue by establishing a boundary for slavery. The belief in the resolution of the slavery issue stemmed from this compromise.

Step-by-step explanation:

In 1820, pro- and antislavery forces were characterized by their differing beliefs on the expansion of slavery. Proslavery forces sought to bring enslaved property into all territories, arguing for popular sovereignty. Antislavery forces, on the other hand, opposed the expansion of slavery and advocated for the restriction of its spread.

The widespread belief that the issue of slavery had been resolved with the passage of the Missouri Compromise can be attributed to the establishment of the 36° 30' parallel as the geographical boundary of slavery. This compromise temporarily resolved the issue by allowing slavery in the southern territories and prohibiting it in the northern territories, creating a sense of balance between the pro- and antislavery forces.

Learn more about Pro- and antislavery forces in 1820