Question

Reread lines 19-20 in "Is 16 Too Young to Drive a Car?" Do the facts found in the other article support or conflict with this interpretation? Explain. a) The facts in the other article support the interpretation b) The facts in the other article conflict with the interpretation c) The other article does not provide relevant information d) It is unclear from the information

Answer 1

The question requires cross-referencing two articles on the appropriate age for driving and using analytical skills to determine if the evidences align or differ, and then stating a clear position on the matter.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question posed relates to analyzing the consistency of facts between two articles on the topic of whether 16 is too young to drive a car. The student is required to reread lines 19-20 of the given text and determine if the evidences found in the comparison article either support or conflict with the interpretation presented in those lines. When formulating a response to a question like this, a student would have to analyze the evidence presented, consider whether the logic of the position is credible, and deliberate if the author may have omitted relevant points.

This culminates in guiding readers through interpreting the evidence to show why a claim is true. The student should state their own position on the policy question clearly and concisely, showing they have evaluated the evidence and the different possible interpretations that could be drawn from it.

Answer 2

To determine if the facts in the other article support or conflict with the interpretation in lines 19-20, we need to analyze the content of the other article.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question asks us to analyze whether the facts found in another article support or conflict with the interpretation in lines 19-20 of the given text. To answer this, we need to consider the evidence presented in the other article. If the facts in the other article align with the interpretation in lines 19-20, they support the interpretation. If the facts conflict with the interpretation, they contradict it. Therefore, the answer to this question depends on the content of the other article.