182k views
4 votes
In the Minnesota v. Dickerson (1993) case, what actions did the officers

perform that the U.S. Supreme Court found to be an illegal search?
A. followed a suspect they were chasing inside a house
B. slid a cellophane-wrapped lump of crack in a pocket
C. conducted a knock and talk at the suspect's motel
D. squeezed the suspect's soft luggage stored on a bus

User Cowmoogun
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The U.S. Supreme Court found the action of sliding a cellophane-wrapped lump of crack in a pocket to be an illegal search.


Step-by-step explanation:

In the Minnesota v. Dickerson (1993) case, the U.S. Supreme Court found the officers' action of sliding a cellophane-wrapped lump of crack in a pocket to be an illegal search.


Learn more about Illegal search

User Hatice
by
7.9k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.