182k views
4 votes
In the Minnesota v. Dickerson (1993) case, what actions did the officers

perform that the U.S. Supreme Court found to be an illegal search?
A. followed a suspect they were chasing inside a house
B. slid a cellophane-wrapped lump of crack in a pocket
C. conducted a knock and talk at the suspect's motel
D. squeezed the suspect's soft luggage stored on a bus

User Cowmoogun
by
7.7k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The U.S. Supreme Court found the action of sliding a cellophane-wrapped lump of crack in a pocket to be an illegal search.


Step-by-step explanation:

In the Minnesota v. Dickerson (1993) case, the U.S. Supreme Court found the officers' action of sliding a cellophane-wrapped lump of crack in a pocket to be an illegal search.


Learn more about Illegal search

User Hatice
by
7.3k points