Answer:
Politicians elected by the votes of 5% or fewer of the population may not enact economic policy in the best interests of 100% of the population.
When politicians are elected by such a small percentage of the population, it raises concerns about the legitimacy of their mandate and the representativeness of their decision-making. Here's why:
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Limited Mandate: When politicians are elected by a very small portion of the population, it means that they may not have received broad-based support or a clear mandate to make decisions on behalf of the entire population. Their policies may not reflect the diverse needs and interests of the majority.
2. Lack of Accountability: With such a low percentage of the population voting for them, politicians may face less accountability to the broader public. They may not feel compelled to consider the concerns and well-being of the entire population when formulating economic policies.
3. Influence of Special Interests: Politicians elected by a tiny fraction of the population may be more susceptible to the influence of special interest groups or powerful individuals who provided support during their election campaign. This can lead to policies that prioritize the interests of these select groups, rather than the overall welfare of the population.
4. Neglected Voices: Economic policies enacted by politicians elected with very limited support may not adequately address the concerns and needs of marginalized communities or minority groups. This can result in inequalities and a lack of equitable distribution of resources and opportunities.
In order to ensure that economic policies benefit the entire population, it is crucial to have a robust and inclusive democratic process where a significant percentage of the population participates in the electoral process. This helps ensure a broader representation of interests and a greater likelihood of policies that reflect the best interests of the entire population.